Research evidence
We prefer primary research, systematic reviews, and guidance from recognized public-health or professional bodies. We identify limitations and do not turn an association into a claim of causation.
How we handle evidence.
The standards we use when research, Islamic sources, community responses, and editorial reflection meet.
What we look for
Islamic sources
Quran and Hadith references are linked or identified wherever practical. Interpretation and disputed rulings require context and should not be presented as universal consensus.
Editorial reflection
Personal experience, practical suggestions, and Peace Projection commentary are distinguished from research findings and religious rulings.
What responses can tell us
Peace Projection surveys are voluntary community questionnaires. Unless a published report documents representative sampling, their results describe only the people who chose to respond. We record the questionnaire version, collection period, response count, exclusions, and limitations before publishing findings.
We do not use a community survey to diagnose a person, estimate prevalence in all Muslims, or prove that one factor caused another.
How pages change
Future modules and major new claims should receive the relevant editorial, scholarly, or wellbeing review before publication. Meaningful changes receive an updated date. Smaller spelling or layout corrections do not create a false freshness signal.
Readers can identify an error or request a correction through the contact page. We review the exact claim and its source before changing it.